Now
that Mitt Romney has all but secured the Republican nomination for President,
political anoraks such as myself get to turn away and indulge in a little
Veep-stakes speculation – or, to the uninitiated, fruitlessly guess who Romney
will pick as his running-mate on the Republican ticket.
It’s
unquestionably an important choice for the former Governor of Massachusetts,
particularly in light of the fact that recent polling shows him to have among
the highest unfavourability ratings of any presidential nominee in memory. A
competent, charismatic or respected vice presidential running-mate would in
theory be able to complement, offset, or, if need be, distract attention away
from the flaws or weaknesses of the presidential nominee. Mitt Romney certainly
has his strengths as a candidate, but the wider electorate – Democrats and
Republicans – have been exposed to many of his lesser qualities: a certain
provincial aloofness, a disconnect due to his vast personal wealth, and an
uninspiring and unexciting personality. For others, the fact that he ruled as a
liberal Republican of already true-blue Massachusetts
is nigh-on unforgivable. He has also been a notorious flip-flopper of any number of issues. In short, pick wisely, and Romney could help ameliorate some
of this.
What
we won’t be getting is a repeat of 2008,
in which John McCain plucked from obscurity the woefully
unprepared intellectual disgrace that was Sarah Palin, seemingly almost on a
whim. Romney will be thorough and meticulous, poring over the data on each
candidate with diligence and care. Different candidates will be able to better
deliver the votes of certain states or crucial demographics. Now that the hard
slog of the Republican nomination is (effectively) over, might Romney be able
to relax a little and choose someone he is truly comfortable with?
The
issue of demographics is important. There is the so-called ‘gender gap’, with
women preferring Obama to Romney 49% to 39% on the latest numbers. As the Wall
Street Journal reports, the racial gap is far wider: Obama is ahead among
blacks 94%-3%, and among Hispanics 64%-24%. This should not be a one-way
analysis, however: Romney leads among whites and men. Moreover, the historical
precedents of picking a particular demographic to broaden overall appeal are
mixed, Geraldine Ferraro in 1984 perhaps being the best example. People do not
tend to vote according to gender. It also risks looking nakedly tokenistic.
So, without further ado, here are the runners and riders in
the 2012 Veep-stakes, from the plausible to the implausible, the outside
chances to the please-God-nos.
Marco Rubio
The Florida Senator is a darling of the Tea Party movement, young, charismatic and popular. Hispanic (his parents were Cuban refugees) he could help Romney begin to overturn his poll deficits with minority voters, particularly in such a crucial swing state. One negative against him is that his compelling personal narrative appears to have been a little embellished. In fact, as The Washington Post reported, his parents fled Cuba over two-and-a-half years before Castro came to power in 1959. He is also politically inexperienced, serving less than two years in office. Rubio could, hypothetically speaking, stand a great chance at winning the nomination come 2016. On top of all of this, he has announced he would turn down any Romney VP offer down, so that seems to be that.
Chris Christie
The current Governor of New Jersey apparently considered seeking the Republican nomination himself, before turning the opportunity down. Christie played down expectations, believing he'll still be in the Governor's Mansion come November, although he has freely admitted he would accept a place on the ticket were he to be asked. A burly and charismatic political brawler, he could really take the fight to Barack Obama. He is, however, comparatively speaking, another North-Eastern moderate, something the Republican grassroots would likely be hostile to.
Rob Portman
The junior Senator from Ohio possesses significant governmental experience and knowledge, serving both in George W. Bush's administration and as director of the OMB. A reliably safe pair of hands. Portman endorsed Romney before the South Carolina primary back in January. A political moderate by temperament, he is said to already enjoy warm personal relations with Romney, and could help deliver Ohio, a crucial swing in any election. There is, though, no getting around the fact that, as well as being relatively unknown, he is an exceptionally boring man. He remains, however, an early favourite for the ticket.
Paul Ryan
The Wisconsin congressman and chairman of the important House Budget Committee, Ryan would constitute a real risk for the Romney team. Adored by his own party's grassroots and Tea Party activists, he would at the same time act as an extremely potent magnet for every single Democratic attack ad. No less a figure than the President has slammed Ryan's budget plan as 'thinly veiled social Darwinism' for its proposals to dramatically slash government spending, none more so than for Medicaid, the highly popular program which provides health care to those on low incomes. Romney would have enough trouble without picking Ryan.
Bob McDonnell
The Governor of Virginia, a state which voted Democrat in 2008 for the first time since LBJ. He won handsomely in 2009 with the simple slogan "Bob's for jobs", and has remained broadly popular since. A retired U.S. army officer with a family straight out of central casting. He has a laser-like focus on what I will lazily call bread-and-butter issues, which could help Romney. He aroused significant controversy however when he supported a bill earlier this year stating that all women seeking a first-trimester abortion must have a vaginal probe inserted into them. McDonnell eventually declared he could not sign the bill into law until state Republicans softened the language, eventually managing to piss everybody off. Some have written his chances off, but I wouldn't be so sure.
Several other names have been touted: the Governor of Louisiana Bobby Jindal; Texas Senator Kay Bailey Hutchinson; South Carolina Governor Nikki Haley; Indiana Governor Mitch Daniels; and so on. These names remain, for now, long shots. FDR's Vice President John Nance Garner once described his ill-defined job as being "not worth a bucket of warm piss." Perhaps not. Many of us will still be waiting with bated breath to find out just who Romney picks.





No comments:
Post a Comment